I recently received a newsletter from First30Days a website that focuses on change, with the following tale that I think most people can relate to:
"We’re all afraid of something. Death, snakes, a visit from your mother-in-law, running out of Ben & Jerry’s Chunky Monkey—scary stuff. But the number one fear reported by people in the U.S. is…
…the idea of making a presentation in public.
That’s according to Paul L. Witt, PhD, assistant professor of communication studies at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth, TX. And not just full-blown speeches. This fear tends to come up any time people have to present their ideas to others.
What are we, scaredy cats? We say it’s time to look fear in the eye and laugh at public speaking. There are plenty of resources out there waiting to help. Toastmasters has clubs across the U.S. (and worldwide) that help people feel more comfortable in front of an audience."
I couldn't agree more.The only way to effectively deal with the fear of public speaking is to seize every opportunity to speak in public! But besides embracing every opportunity to face your fear, it also helps to have the right tools to tackle the job. Wealth Creation Africa has developed the PowerTalk program to provide such tools helping to transform even the scarediest of cats into a potent and effective public speaker or business presenter.
Monday, June 23, 2008
Monday, June 16, 2008
Do You Need Money to Make Money?
That's the billion dollar question hey. If you were to ask it to our list of 7 billionaires we are pretty sure you will get some very interesting answers. One started out as a busboy, another put himself through college by working as a porter, yet another was a single mother on welfare.....well you get the picture. Hey read for yourself
How 7 Self-Made Titans Financed Their Success and tell me whether you need money or not to build a fortune
How 7 Self-Made Titans Financed Their Success and tell me whether you need money or not to build a fortune
Friday, May 23, 2008
A Lesson in Leadership from Didier Drogba
The sad sight of Didier Drogba dejectedly trudging off the pitch in
It has been argued that after Zidane left the field of play
Can
Playing in a team of footballers is really no different from being part of a corporate team. Sport is ruthless, there is a winner and a loser and history as they say never remembers who came 2nd. It’s pretty much the same in the untamed jungle of business, companies fiercely compete for clients, customers, market share, talent, capital etc and the losers of corporate battles are confined to the dustbin of history.
In business like sport conditions are amorphous and ambiguous teams need to continuously adapt to the changing terrain. Teams need to adapt even to the loss of a key player. The greatest testimony to good leadership is how well the team performs when the leader is absent: winning whatever the in spite of the external circumstances.
Sunday, May 18, 2008
Can an African Country can win gold at the Olympics?
With the August 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics rapidly approaching one is reminded of the Olympic ideals of competition and excellence. Putting aside the recent raucous around the Olympic torch and China’s human rights record in Tibet the world’s nations will bring their best athletes to Beijing and engage in ferocious athletic competition. As individual athletes compete the ultimate glory though belongs to competing nations as each medal awards ceremony is accompanied by the raising of flags and a rendition of the victor's national anthem. At the end of the games the medals table will be finalized and each country will know how well or poorly it has fared.
What if national economic performance was an Olympic sport which countries would be on the podium watching their flags being hoisted? And whose anthem would be played? Well for the 15th straight year the anthem played is "The Star-Spangled Banner". This is the finding of the 20th World Competitiveness Yearbook report released May 15, 2008 by IMD business school in Lausanne, Switzerland.
The IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook measures 55 countries on the basis of 323 criteria. The report's author, professor Stéphane Garelli, expects Singapore to take the top spot next year.The small city-state trails the U.S. by less than seven-tenths of a point in the 2008 rankings. While it still has the world's strongest domestic economy, the U.S. is particularly vulnerable because its financial sector contributes 40% to corporate profits.
Only one African country makes the cut to be included in the 55 countries in the IMD survey, South Africa which this year is ranked 53 down from 50 in 2007. The criteria used to compute the rankings are grouped into 4 main factors Economic performance, Government efficiency, Business efficiency and Infrastructure which are divided into 20 sub-factors.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) also provides a similar competitiveness ranking. The usefulness of these rankings can be debated but I think a clear observation is the paucity of African countries. In the eyes of the world or at least those who compile the rankings African countries are not meaningful players on the global economic stage.
While many emerging economies post double-digit annual growth rates, they often still lack sophisticated financial markets, highly developed education systems, and the macroeconomic stability needed to outrank more established rivals on the WEF list.
So the critical question to ask at this juncture is how can we make African countries more competitive? At least to the point where we see more African countries listed on the IMD and WEF rankings.
The crux of the rankings is that countries need to create an optimum business environment. There is a host of things that African governments and organizations can do. These have included notable initiatives such as Mo Ibrahim’s Prize for Achievement in African Leadership.
To achieve economic competitiveness and leadership there are 2 critical areas that the continents nations needs to seriously invest in:
1. Math and Science Education
2. Entrepreneurship Development
Industries such as Finance, Information Technology, Engineering, Life Sciences and Biotechnology, require enormous investments and development of talent in Math and Science. In this regard efforts such as those by Neil Turok whose stated dream is to produce an African Einstein need support by governments and industry. Turok’s efforts have seen the establishment of the African Institute for Mathematical Sciences.
South Korea for instance has prioritized the development of biotech and is a leader in stem cell research. The country’s ubiquitous Wi-Fi and broadband access has made it one of the most networked places on earth.
The result of this whole hearted embrace of technology has a direct business consequence. South Korean mobile phone companies Samsung Electronics and LG have moved up the global market share rankings to become the 2nd and 4th global phone makers, in the process leapfrogging over such formidable competitors as Motorola (USA) and Sony Ericsson (Japan/ Sweden).
The second area of entrepreneurship development is more elusive. A formal approach to teaching entrepreneurship exists, where the concept is studied, understood and codified. The practice of entrepreneurship however often bears little or no co-relation to the study of it. It’s hard to think that Sir Richard Branson actually took a course in entrepreneurship. On the other hand a host of entrepreneurs have caught the bug while studying for an MBA or other graduate studies. There neither seems to be a ‘right’ age to become an entrepreneur; Ray Kroc started McDonald’s at 53 while the world’s youngest self made billionaire Mark Zuckerberg launched Facebook as a 20 year old Harvard student. The rule with entrepreneurship seems to be that there is no rule.
This state of affairs however is not a call for inaction. The solution as entrepreneurship itself may consist in constantly trying, experimenting failing and succeeding. It by all intents and purposed is a mix of the formal and informal: teaching entrepreneurship courses at universities and colleges, promoting mentorship and internship programs, celebrating the achievements of homegrown entrepreneurs and encouraging young people to take risks and try new things.
Maybe with the adoption of these measures 10 years from now the anthem being played will be "Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika", and since 3 African countries have that as their national anthem it’s anyone’s guess which one of them will be the gold, silver or bronze medalist!
What if national economic performance was an Olympic sport which countries would be on the podium watching their flags being hoisted? And whose anthem would be played? Well for the 15th straight year the anthem played is "The Star-Spangled Banner". This is the finding of the 20th World Competitiveness Yearbook report released May 15, 2008 by IMD business school in Lausanne, Switzerland.
The IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook measures 55 countries on the basis of 323 criteria. The report's author, professor Stéphane Garelli, expects Singapore to take the top spot next year.The small city-state trails the U.S. by less than seven-tenths of a point in the 2008 rankings. While it still has the world's strongest domestic economy, the U.S. is particularly vulnerable because its financial sector contributes 40% to corporate profits.
Only one African country makes the cut to be included in the 55 countries in the IMD survey, South Africa which this year is ranked 53 down from 50 in 2007. The criteria used to compute the rankings are grouped into 4 main factors Economic performance, Government efficiency, Business efficiency and Infrastructure which are divided into 20 sub-factors.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) also provides a similar competitiveness ranking. The usefulness of these rankings can be debated but I think a clear observation is the paucity of African countries. In the eyes of the world or at least those who compile the rankings African countries are not meaningful players on the global economic stage.
While many emerging economies post double-digit annual growth rates, they often still lack sophisticated financial markets, highly developed education systems, and the macroeconomic stability needed to outrank more established rivals on the WEF list.
So the critical question to ask at this juncture is how can we make African countries more competitive? At least to the point where we see more African countries listed on the IMD and WEF rankings.
The crux of the rankings is that countries need to create an optimum business environment. There is a host of things that African governments and organizations can do. These have included notable initiatives such as Mo Ibrahim’s Prize for Achievement in African Leadership.
To achieve economic competitiveness and leadership there are 2 critical areas that the continents nations needs to seriously invest in:
1. Math and Science Education
2. Entrepreneurship Development
Industries such as Finance, Information Technology, Engineering, Life Sciences and Biotechnology, require enormous investments and development of talent in Math and Science. In this regard efforts such as those by Neil Turok whose stated dream is to produce an African Einstein need support by governments and industry. Turok’s efforts have seen the establishment of the African Institute for Mathematical Sciences.
South Korea for instance has prioritized the development of biotech and is a leader in stem cell research. The country’s ubiquitous Wi-Fi and broadband access has made it one of the most networked places on earth.
The result of this whole hearted embrace of technology has a direct business consequence. South Korean mobile phone companies Samsung Electronics and LG have moved up the global market share rankings to become the 2nd and 4th global phone makers, in the process leapfrogging over such formidable competitors as Motorola (USA) and Sony Ericsson (Japan/ Sweden).
The second area of entrepreneurship development is more elusive. A formal approach to teaching entrepreneurship exists, where the concept is studied, understood and codified. The practice of entrepreneurship however often bears little or no co-relation to the study of it. It’s hard to think that Sir Richard Branson actually took a course in entrepreneurship. On the other hand a host of entrepreneurs have caught the bug while studying for an MBA or other graduate studies. There neither seems to be a ‘right’ age to become an entrepreneur; Ray Kroc started McDonald’s at 53 while the world’s youngest self made billionaire Mark Zuckerberg launched Facebook as a 20 year old Harvard student. The rule with entrepreneurship seems to be that there is no rule.
This state of affairs however is not a call for inaction. The solution as entrepreneurship itself may consist in constantly trying, experimenting failing and succeeding. It by all intents and purposed is a mix of the formal and informal: teaching entrepreneurship courses at universities and colleges, promoting mentorship and internship programs, celebrating the achievements of homegrown entrepreneurs and encouraging young people to take risks and try new things.
Maybe with the adoption of these measures 10 years from now the anthem being played will be "Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika", and since 3 African countries have that as their national anthem it’s anyone’s guess which one of them will be the gold, silver or bronze medalist!
Saturday, April 26, 2008
The Need for a New Mindset
In an interview on Zimbabwean national television, the Success Coach, Jonah Mungoshi talks about the need for a new mindset in dealing with Africa's economic challenges.
Africa's Billionaires....Why aren't there more?
Africa is now home to two new billionaires according to US Forbes Magazine's annual ranking of the world's billionaires. They are Nigeria's industrialist/sugar merchant Aliko Dangote, who seems to be involved in practically every industry and South Africa's minerals magnate Patrice Motsepe. Dangote made his money from businesses that include the number one sugar production company in the country, a cement factory and a virtual monopoly on the production of pasta in Nigeria. Dangote according to Forbes rich list has a fortune of $3.3 billion.
Patrice Motsepe, lawyer-turn-mine magnate made an estimated $2.4 billion buying unprofitable gold mines and turning them round. He moved from being the first black partner at Bowman Gilfillan law firm in Johannesburg to running a mining contract firm after apartheid collapsed. But Africa's richest men, according to Forbes still remain two white South Africans who inherited their wealth. Nicky Oppenheimer and family whose interests are primarily in mining giants De Beers and Anglo American are worth $5.7 billion, while Johann Rupert and his family head Swiss luxury goods group Richemont, which owns the Cartier label and the Rembrandt Group (Remgro) in South Africa. The family's fortune is worth $3.8 billion.
Patrice Motsepe, lawyer-turn-mine magnate made an estimated $2.4 billion buying unprofitable gold mines and turning them round. He moved from being the first black partner at Bowman Gilfillan law firm in Johannesburg to running a mining contract firm after apartheid collapsed. But Africa's richest men, according to Forbes still remain two white South Africans who inherited their wealth. Nicky Oppenheimer and family whose interests are primarily in mining giants De Beers and Anglo American are worth $5.7 billion, while Johann Rupert and his family head Swiss luxury goods group Richemont, which owns the Cartier label and the Rembrandt Group (Remgro) in South Africa. The family's fortune is worth $3.8 billion.
A Journey of a Thousand Miles.........
I'd like to share with you the wealthcreationafrica.com adventure of creating wealth, abundance, joy and purpose. I believe that within each African heart is a spark that can ignite the wealth creation engine that our continent sorely needs. Africa is too rich to be poor, yet every nation on the continent struggles with deep rooted poverty, endemic disease and intractably bad leadership.
Africans have a rich legacy of creating wealth demonstrated by the world's first Universities in the Sahel, the sophisticated architecture of the ancient Egypt, Great Zimbabwe, Mapungubwe and Thulamela; the great trade routes centred around fabled locations as Timbuktu and Zanzibar.
Clearly Wealth Creation is not a new concept on the African continent yet somewhere along the way something has gone wrong. It is my desire to engage in a powerful dialogue with Africa's citizens to shed light on this issue.
Of greater importance, however is to reignite Africa's powerful heritage of wealth creation.
Africans have a rich legacy of creating wealth demonstrated by the world's first Universities in the Sahel, the sophisticated architecture of the ancient Egypt, Great Zimbabwe, Mapungubwe and Thulamela; the great trade routes centred around fabled locations as Timbuktu and Zanzibar.
Clearly Wealth Creation is not a new concept on the African continent yet somewhere along the way something has gone wrong. It is my desire to engage in a powerful dialogue with Africa's citizens to shed light on this issue.
Of greater importance, however is to reignite Africa's powerful heritage of wealth creation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
